[If you agree with what we have to…]
Socialist Organiser1982 1982-09-30Read it in the scan (PDF), scan page 15 →
Read from the scan by machine and not corrected: expect misread words, and now and then a caption or a line from a neighbouring story. For anything you quote, read the scan.
Scan page 15
If you agree with what we have to say, you can help. Become a supporter of the Socialist Organiser Alliance -groups are established in most large for more information, write at once Socialist Organiser is not just a We fight to organise workers struggle for a new leadership labour movement.
towns.
To 'Get Organised' in the fight, us at 28 Middle Lane, London N8. Name ..
Address paper. in the in the thrown out by one court. Questioned in another court case how he had lost earnings by coming to court he said "I couldn't rightly say" The prosecutor leapt to his defence, explaining that the police had filled in the form on his behalf.
Witnessed That was not all the police were filling in if the New Statesman is right. The Claimants Detence Campaign obtained a copy of a form in which Cronin gave evidence against claimants. The form, already filled in, was signed as having been witnessed by a Detective Constable. The only snag in this system was that Cronin himself hadn't signed it.
An embarrassed Chief Constable, Peter Imbert, announced an enquiry into this curious form of clairvoyant witnessing.
The police have operated their usual variation of Catch 22 over complaints. Where no-one has laid a complaint, properties were involved, Patel.
Not only has the prosecutor cleared Cronin in a statement from any involvement in criminal acts, but the DHSS have announced that in future they will be sending bed and breakfast money to the two landlords for them to distribute to the claimants.
Meanwhile, John Minshall, the head of fraud investigation at the Oxford DHSS office, said his office had suspected fraud for about a year, but had done nothing to stop it.
Explosive
This has led to the potentially most explosive defence - one which so far has been rejected by the courts. One defence lawyer claimed that the prosecution should fail because counter clerks who paid over the money knew they were part of a set-up.
He produced a case law to show that for a deception charge to stick; the person would work in them all.
But they need have had no fears about their. bench of worthies. A couple of long delays by the magistrates and another defendant bit the dust for 30 days.
Meanwhile on Monday, Organise against the Tebbit Bill with the new broadsheet from the Mobilising committee for Trade Rights.
10n n/e twp pius post from 28 Middle Lane, London N8: result of job cuts. After hearing that a claim for 25 more staff had been rewarded with two extra peopie instead, they walked out, and planned further disruptive meetings.
----- pull-quotes -----
STOP TUr
LING COMMITTEE TRADE UNION RIGHTS