Atlantic war shook the world

Scan page 11

THE Argentine military was noi simply brought down as a result of Thatcher's victory in the South Atlantic war, as Martin Thomas claims in his "personal view" in SO 161. The military regime was in reality disintegrating before Galtieri invaded the Malvinas islands in 1982.

Nor is Martin Thomas's general view of the war valid. He says "just as a defeat for Thatcher's bloodthirsty buccaneering would have massively improved the situation for the British working class, so the defeat of Galtieri's desperate "mini-imperialism" has benefitted the Argentine workers."

The first is very true, the second is not. The South Atlantic war was not a little anachronistic affair between two essentially similar powers - with one simply bigger and more powerful than the other. It was between a major imperialist power and a Third World country dominated economically and politically by imperialism. It was a major world event.

The fact that Britain won strengthened imperialism all ovér the world. It was a major factor creating the conditions for Reagan to invade Grenada. It has brought the invasion of Nicaragua closer. It has given the green light for increased US intervention in El Salvador, increased imperialist intervention in the Middle East and strengthened the hand of South Africa in Southern Africa.

It cannot therefore be judged on the basis of its conjunctural effects on the British or Argentine working class. Military regimes in Third World countries in Central and Southern America or in Africa are the creatures of imperialism. When imperialism is strengthened, they are strengtened. When imperialism is weakened, they are weakened.

This is not to say that the military are about to take over again in Argentina, but the events must be seen against this ALAN THORNETT other things being equal, raising Talbot's production co it will reduce sales. So the pol cannot increase the over amount of work for all Tal workers. Any extra work Talbot workers in one coun has to be at the expense Talbot workers somewhere els A law to forbid imports foreign-built Talbot cars wor certainly cover other makes & probably other products too. : The end result of such imp control laws can only be a c back in world trade, therefor cutback in production and jo and also higher prices (si more expensive home-m‹ goods substitute for cheal imports).

In underdeveloped co tries there can be a case import controls to protect inf industries. But not in Westi Europe.

However harmless the imp controls demand may look first, it can only lead eventur to workers in different countr competing with each other shares of a static or declin total amount of work.

The alternative is not idealise capitalist free trade, ' to fight for demands like wo sharing with no loss of p workers' control, and pul ownership on an internatio scale JOHN LEAGRAV Islingtc BADGES 25p or £2 for 10 || 16p postage) from 'Mole Bady 165, Liverpool Rd., London N

----- pull-quotes -----

BACK THE Ingo LANASI